A good man leaveth an inheritance to his children's children. (KJV): multi-generational foresight commended; see the fuller treatment at /bible/inheritance-and-legacy.
Proverbs 13:22Two proverbs that do not cancel each other out
“A good man leaveth an inheritance to his children’s children” (Proverbs 13:22, KJV) reads like a straightforward endorsement of leaving money behind: multi-generational planning, not just providing for the next generation but the one after it. Held alone, it could sound like inheritance is simply good, the bigger the better.
But the same book of Proverbs immediately complicates that reading: “An inheritance may be gotten hastily at the beginning; but the end thereof shall not be blessed” (Proverbs 20:21, KJV). The verse pictures an inheritance grabbed in haste, and many readers draw the wider point: money that arrives suddenly, unearned, before the person receiving it has the character to steward it, tends to do harm rather than good. The prodigal son’s early demand for his share is that proverb turned into a story (Luke 15:11-16). Scripture is not contradicting itself; it is describing two different things. Proverbs 13:22 commends foresight, planning ahead for those who come after you. Proverbs 20:21 warns about timing and preparation, money handed to someone before they are ready for it. Both are true at once, which is why an estate plan needs both a giving instinct and real caution about how and when transfers land.
Solomon’s dread
Ecclesiastes adds a third layer. Its Preacher, traditionally identified as Solomon, the richest testator in the Bible, is not comforted by his own wealth’s future; he dreads it: “I hated all my labour which I had taken under the sun: because I should leave it unto the man that shall be after me. And who knoweth whether he shall be a wise man or a fool?” (Ecclesiastes 2:18-19, KJV). The fear is not that the money will run out. It is that it will land in the hands of someone unprepared to carry it well, a risk no amount of planning documents alone can fully solve. See inheritance and legacy for the full biblical picture, including the corrective of Ecclesiastes 7:11: wisdom together with an inheritance is what actually works.
Preparing heirs, not just money
The practical answer these passages point toward is sequencing: transfer wisdom before wealth, and let the size and timing of what heirs receive track their demonstrated readiness to handle it, not just a fixed age or a document’s default schedule. In practice, that looks like:
- Family money conversations, while you’re alive to have them. Let heirs see how you budget, how you give, and why: the reasoning, not just the results. A number in a will teaches nothing; watching decisions get made for years does.
- Teaching stewardship on purpose, not assuming it transfers by osmosis. Start early, scaled to age. The site’s own learning path exists for exactly this, and there is no reason a teenager’s inheritance-readiness should be left to chance any more than their algebra is.
- Matching transfer size to demonstrated faithfulness. A large, unstaged transfer to someone with no track record of managing smaller amounts well repeats Proverbs 20:21’s warning; a staged approach (smaller amounts, then more as stewardship is shown) takes it seriously without withholding love.
Giving at death vs. giving during life
An estate plan is also a giving decision, not only a distribution decision. Giving during life lets you see the impact, correct course, and model generosity for heirs in real time; see generosity and tithing. Giving at death, through a charitable beneficiary designation or a bequest in a will, lets resources keep serving a cause after you are gone. Neither replaces the other; many households do both, treating the final disposition of an estate as one more place where “here is what we valued” gets said one last time, in a way heirs cannot misread.
The practice
- Hold at least one real conversation with your heirs about your finances and your reasoning before you need a will to speak for you.
- If a significant inheritance is coming, consider staging it rather than transferring it in one lump sum, especially to someone without a track record managing money well.
- Decide now what, if anything, your estate itself will give away, and write it in.
Before you go
Check yourself
1How do Proverbs 13:22 and Proverbs 20:21 fit together without cancelling each other?
They describe different things. Proverbs 13:22 commends foresight: planning ahead for those who come after you. Proverbs 20:21 warns about timing and preparation: money arriving before the receiver has the character to steward it. An estate plan needs both the giving instinct and real caution about how transfers land.
2What is the practical sequencing this lesson points to?
Transfer wisdom before wealth: family money conversations while you are alive to have them, teaching stewardship on purpose rather than assuming it transfers by osmosis, and matching transfer size to demonstrated faithfulness instead of to a fixed age or a document's default schedule.
3Solomon was the richest testator in the Bible. Was he comforted by what he would leave behind?
No. He dreaded it. Ecclesiastes 2:18-19 fears not that the money will run out but that it will land with someone who may be a fool. Which is exactly why preparing heirs matters more than maximising the transfer, and why no document alone solves it.
Do this now
Hold one real conversation with an heir this week about your finances and your reasoning (the why, not just the results) before a will has to speak for you.