Bible vs Money

Learn · Investing

Index funds and diversification: give a portion to seven

Updated 2026-10-28 · Sources: 4 · Founders (18-25), Stewards (26-60)

Give a portion to seven, and also to eight; for thou knowest not what evil shall be upon the earth. (KJV): ancient merchant wisdom to spread ventures because no one can foresee which will fail; a fair application to modern diversification, not a stock-picking formula.

Ecclesiastes 11:2

Give a portion to seven, and also to eight

Ecclesiastes 11:2 keeps an old merchant’s rule: “Give a portion to seven, and also to eight; for thou knowest not what evil shall be upon the earth” (KJV). Spread your ventures, because you cannot know in advance which ship goes down.

Applied to investing, that is diversification. Own many companies rather than a few, so that one failure cannot sink everything. This is an application, not the verse’s own subject; the writer meant literal trading ventures, not funds. But the reasoning carries over exactly: the future is hidden, so do not stake it all on one guess.

What an index fund actually is

An index fund holds every company in a defined market index, in proportion, and nobody hand-picks the winners. The S&P 500, for instance, is a list of 500 large U.S. companies.

Buy one share of a broad index fund and you own a sliver of every business on that list. That is diversification in a single purchase, at very low cost.

An index fund will never beat the market, because it is the market. It will also never badly trail the market. The second half of that sentence matters more than most people expect.

Keep one distinction straight. An S&P 500 fund holds large U.S. companies only. A total-market fund holds those plus mid-sized and small ones, a few thousand in all. Both are broad; the total-market fund is broader.

Expense ratios compound too

Every fund charges an expense ratio: a yearly percentage of your money, taken to cover the fund’s costs. The averages are published each year.

Fund typeAverage expense ratio, 2025
Index equity mutual funds0.05%
Index equity ETFs0.14%
All equity mutual funds0.40%
Actively managed domestic equity mutual funds0.64%
The same, at small fund companies1.00%

(Asset-weighted averages, Investment Company Institute, Trends in the Expenses and Fees of Funds, 2025, published March 2026. As of 2026 this is the current edition; ICI refreshes it each spring.)

Those gaps look tiny. They are not, because fees compound the way returns do, only in reverse. A 1% yearly fee does not cost you 1% of your final balance. It takes a compounding slice of every year’s growth, on top of every prior year’s growth.

So run it once. Save $500 a month for 30 years. The market grows 7% a year before fees:

Expense ratioEnds withCost of the fee
0.05% (typical broad index fund)$604,002n/a
1.00% (typical active fund at a small fund company)$502,258$101,744

Same market, same saving, same thirty years, and the fee alone ate a six-figure sum. (Computed with this site’s own engine; put your own numbers into the compounder.)

Low cost is not a minor feature of an index fund. It is most of the reason index investors keep what the market actually earns.

Why most active managers fall short

S&P Dow Jones Indices measures this twice a year in its SPIVA scorecard, and the pattern is stubborn. These are U.S. equity funds scored against their own benchmarks over 15 years, with data through 30 June 2025:

Fund categoryUnderperformed its benchmark over 15 years
All large-cap funds (vs. S&P 500)88.3%
All mid-cap funds (vs. S&P MidCap 400)83.7%
All small-cap funds (vs. S&P SmallCap 600)85.4%
All domestic funds (vs. S&P Composite 1500)92.5%

Not one of the 18 U.S. equity categories in that report had a majority of active managers beating its benchmark over 15 years. Survival is its own filter, too: of the large-cap funds running 15 years earlier, only 49.95% were still open at the end.

Read the claim carefully. It does not say nobody ever beats the market. It says that picking, in advance, who will has proved very hard even for professionals. That is why a low-cost index fund is a reasonable default rather than a compromise.

Because SPIVA publishes twice a year, the edition is part of the claim. The table above is the mid-year 2025 edition; the scorecard library linked in the sources always carries the current one.

Dollar-cost averaging

Dollar-cost averaging means investing a fixed amount on a fixed schedule, whatever the price is that week (Investor.gov). When prices are high the contribution buys fewer shares, and when they are low it buys more.

It does not guarantee a better result than one lump sum invested at once. What it removes is the guesswork, and the pull to wait for a “right time” that never announces itself. It is a habit you can automate, not a market call.

Put the three ideas together and the shape of a sound long-term portfolio is plain: broad, cheap, funded on a schedule. For the biblical case for patient multiplication, read investing and multiplication. For how to open an account, read accounts: getting started. This is general education, not a recommendation of any fund or provider. Secular explainers (Two Cents on what an index fund is, and Ben Felix on the case for them and on advisor incentives) are linked, not embedded, on the video shelf. The SEC’s definition is on further reading.

Before you go

Check yourself

  1. 1What is an index fund, and what does it guarantee?

    A fund holding every company in a defined index, in proportion, with nobody hand-picking winners. It will never beat the market, because it is the market, and it will never badly trail the market either. The second half of that sentence matters more than most people expect.

  2. 2How much did a 1% expense ratio cost in the lesson's worked example?

    $101,744. Saving $500 a month for 30 years at 7% before fees ends at $604,002 at a 0.05% expense ratio and $502,258 at 1.00%: same market, same saving, same thirty years, because fees compound the way returns do, only in reverse.

  3. 3SPIVA shows most active managers trailing their benchmark. Does that mean nobody ever beats the market?

    No. Read the claim carefully. It says that picking, in advance, who will beat it has proved very hard even for professionals: 88.3% of large-cap funds trailed the S&P 500 over 15 years, and only 49.95% of the large-cap funds running 15 years earlier were even still open at the end.

Do this now

Open the fact sheet for your largest fund and find two numbers: its expense ratio and its top ten holdings. Deliberate ignorance about what you own is also a decision: replace it with one look.

Carry this with you

Ecclesiastes 11:2

Read it in its own context this week, then keep it.

Sources

  1. S&P Dow Jones Indices, SPIVA U.S. Scorecard, Mid-Year 2025 edition (PDF, data as of 30 June 2025): the 15-year underperformance and survivorship figures
  2. S&P Dow Jones Indices: SPIVA U.S. scorecard library (always carries the current edition)
  3. Investment Company Institute, Trends in the Expenses and Fees of Funds, 2025 (March 2026): the expense-ratio averages (ici.org refuses scripted requests; the PDF opens normally in a browser)
  4. Investor.gov: Dollar-Cost Averaging (glossary)